Critique of THE PROTESTANT'S DILEMMA by Devin Rose
Chapter 10 - Identifying the Canon
Page 80:
The historical realities of the canon of Scripture leave Protestants in
a pickle. How can they know with certainty that the sixty-six books in
their Bibles are the correct set of inspired books? They need to know
with the strongest certainty possible, because they hold to sola
scriptura – that from the Bible alone comes all of the saving truths
that God revealed for man to believe and live by. But if they’re not
certain that the books contained in their Bible are all inspired by
God, then those truths become open for debate; likewise, if they
can’t say for sure that they haven’t left out some inspired books, then
they face the possibility that some saving truths are missing.
Note: Scripture will be consistent and not be in conflict with itself.
Sola Scriptura is a formal principle of many Protestant Christian
denominations and one of the five solas. It was a foundational
doctrinal principle of the Protestant Reformation held by the
Reformers, who taught that authentication of Scripture is governed by
the discernible excellence of the text as well as the personal witness
of the Holy Spirit to the heart of each man. Some Evangelical and
Baptist denominations state the doctrine of sola Scriptura more
strongly: Scripture is self-authenticating, clear (perspicuous) to the
rational reader, its own interpreter ("Scripture interprets
Scripture"), and sufficient of itself to be the final authority of
Christian doctrine. Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
Pages 80-81: One influential
modern Protestant leader has come up with a new way to handle this
dilemma. It was Protestant pastor R.C. Sproul who first famously
described the Bible as a “fallible collection of infallible books.”
Since only processes or agents (people, groups) can be fallible, Sproul
is asserting that God did not protect the process by which the canon
was discerned. So the canon is the result of a human process that may
very well have had errors – wrong books included and/or inspired ones
excluded.
Note: The Catholic Church has been fallible throughout its history.
Novatian (c. 200–258) was a scholar, priest, theologian and antipope
who held the title between 251 and 258. Greek authors, Pope Damasus I
and Prudentius give his name as Novatus. He was a noted theologian and
writer, the first Roman theologian who used the Latin language, at a
time when there was much debate about how to deal with Christians who
had lapsed and wished to return, and the issue of penance. Consecrated
as pope by three bishops in 251, he adopted a more rigorous position
than the established Pope Cornelius. Novatian was shortly afterwards
excommunicated: the schismatic church which he established persisted
for several centuries (see Novatianism). Novatian fled during a period
of persecutions, and may have been a martyr. Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
Page 81: The Jews in the Old
Covenant didn’t have an infallible magisterium to tell them which books
belonged in their canon, yet they were still the people of God and
seemed to discern divine revelation just fine. So, some Protestants
say, the Catholic assertion that we have to know the canon with
“infallible” certainty is baseless. It is simply not necessary to have
such certainty; instead, the proper use of our God-given reason can
give us enough confidence in the canon of Scripture to allow us to know
God’s will.
Note: The Catholic Church has been fallible throughout its history.
Antipope Felix II was installed as Pope in 355 AD after the Emperor
Constantius II banished the reigning Pope, Liberius, for refusing to
subscribe the sentence of condemnation against Saint Athanasius. In May
357 AD the Roman laity, which had remained faithful to Liberius,
demanded that Constantius, who was on a visit to Rome, should recall
Liberius. The Emperor planned to have Felix and Liberius rule jointly,
but when Liberius returned Felix was forced to retire to Porto, near
Rome, where, after making an unsuccessful attempt to establish himself
again in Rome, he died on 22 November 365 AD. This Felix was later
confused with a Roman martyr named Felix, with the result that he was
included in lists of the Popes as Felix II and that the succeeding
Popes of the same name (Pope Felix III and Pope Felix IV) were given
wrong numerals, as was Antipope Felix V. Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
Pages 81-82: Other Protestants
are not comfortable with Sproul’s admission that the process to
determine the canon was fallible. They realize that if the canon of
Scripture is not inerrant, then there is no use claiming that the books
themselves are inerrant. Sproul himself recognized that he had no
principled reason to believe with certainty that the all too fallible
Church of the early centuries correctly selected the books of the
Bible, or that the likewise fallible Protestant Reformers of the
sixteenth century did, either. Hence his supremely unsatisfactory
formula, which has become an uncomfortable perch upon which some
Protestants try to find rest from answering the question of the canon.
Note: The Catholic Church has been fallible throughout its history.
Ursicinus, also known as Ursinus, was elected pope in a violently
contested election in 366 as a rival to Pope Damasus I. He ruled in
Rome for several months in 366–367, was afterwards declared antipope,
and died after 381. The upper-class partisans of Felix supported the
election of Damasus, but the opposing supporters of Liberius, the
deacons and laity, supported Ursicinus; the two were elected
simultaneously, in an atmosphere of rioting. Supporters already clashed
at the beginning of October. Such was the violence and bloodshed that
the two praefecti of the city were called in to restore order, and
after a first setback, when they were driven to the suburbs and a
massacre of 137 was perpetrated in the basilica of Sicininus (as cited
in Ammianus Marcellinus), the prefects banished Ursicinus to Gaul.
There was further violence when he returned, which continued after
Ursicinus was exiled again. Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
Page 82: The main difficulty
with this position is that even as it correctly identifies the problem
with accepting the discernment of an “apostate” Church, or fallible
reformers, or the subjective internal assessment of believers, it
nonetheless accepts their conclusions in a lump. In fact, Sproul and
other sympathetic Protestants believe that their Protestant canon is
inerrant, that the list of books is exactly right, even though they
flatly reject the belief that God protected from error any of the
people who actually did the discernment. They are trying to produce a
certainty from these various fallible sources that is somehow greater
than the sum of its parts, but that is mere wishful thinking. It is not
an assent of faith supported by solid reasoning but rather a fideistic
leap of faith supported by solid reasoning but rather a fideistic leap
off unstable rocks.
Note: Scripture will be consistent and not be in conflict with itself unlike the Catholic Church.
Luther said, "a simple layman armed with Scripture is greater than the
mightiest pope without it". The intention of the Reformation was to
correct the perceived errors of the Catholic Church by appeal to the
uniqueness of the Bible's authority and to reject what Catholics
considered to be Apostolic Tradition as a source of original authority
alongside the Bible, wherever Tradition did not have Biblical support
or where it supposedly contradicted Scripture.
Page 82: As for the Jews,
although it’s true that they did not have an infallible magisterium and
that their canon grew over time as God sent more prophets to them, it’s
also true that the New Covenant is greater than the Old in every way.
The Israelites ate manna in the desert, but the new people of God feed
on Christ himself in the Eucharist.
Note: The Catholic Church misses the purpose of the Eucharist.
And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them,
saying, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance
of Me.” Luke 22:19.
For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes. 1 Corinthians 11:26.
Note: The Apostle Paul did not consider the Eucharist the actual body of Jesus Christ.
Page 82: The Jews were given
the Law to help them know and follow God’s will, but members of the
Church are given God’s Spirit to help them live in the freedom of
Christ.
Note: In a similar manner, Christians have sola scriptura.
All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped
for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
Note: The fictional deuteroncanonical books are not scripture per the Apostle Paul.
Page 83: The discernment of the
canon was a messy process that took centuries, during which time the
Church had to sift through numerous proposed alternatives. And then,
about a thousand years afterward, the Protestant Reformers came along
to edit the Old Testament list of books. Sproul, one of Protestantism’s
foremost apologists, has taken the incredible position that though this
very human-looking process was not guided by God, it somehow got the
books of the Bible exactly right. I would submit that Sproul’s belief
is a much wilder (and less probable) article of faith than simply
believing as Catholics do in a Spirit-guided Church.
Note: Either the author is a liar or a poor student of history.
Antipope Eulalius (died 423) was antipope from December 418 to April
419, in opposition to Pope Boniface I. At first the claims of Eulalius
as the rightful Pope were recognized by the Emperor Honorius, who sent
a letter dated 3 January 419 recognizing him and pardoning the
partisans of Boniface provided they left Rome. On 6 January Eulalius
celebrated Epiphany at St. Peter's, while Boniface and his supporters
remained at St. Paul's-outside-the-Walls. But Boniface's supporters
refused to concede defeat, and petitioned the Emperor, claiming
irregularities in the election. In response, Honorius suspended his
previous order on 15 January, and summoned both parties to appear
before him, along with other Italian bishops, on 8 February. At that
hearing, a final judgment was deferred to a second synod that would
meet at Spoleto on 13 June. Meanwhile, all parties were ordered to stay
out of Rome, and the bishop of Spoleto would celebrate mass on "the
greatest of all Christian holy days." Despite this reversal Eulalius'
position appeared to be the stronger, for he had the support of the
Empress Galla Placidia and her husband Constantius, because he had been
elected first. However, Stewart Oost believes this very strength led
Eulalius to overconfidence. He returned to Rome 18 March to celebrate
Easter Sunday, but this flouting of the Emperor's orders lost him the
support of these two powerful individuals; the inhabitants of Rome
rioted, and the Urban prefect, Aurelius Anicius Symmachus, had his
police occupy the Lateran, where Eulalius had made his base, and escort
Eulalius out of the city to a house and kept under guard. On 3 April,
the Emperor officially recognized Boniface as the rightful Pope.
Eulalius is said to have subsequently become a bishop under Celestine
I. According to the Liber Pontificalis, Eulalius was deposed by a synod
of 52 bishops and sent to Campania; then, when Boniface died in 422,
the people and clergy of Rome petitioned him to be the new Pope, but
Eulalius refused their offer. The same source states he died one year
later.
Page 83: If Protestantism is
true, then the basis for all of our Christian beliefs, the Bible, may
well contain books that God did not inspire, or it may leave out books
that he did. At best we can be somewhat sure that many of the books of
the Bible are probably inspired. According to the influential
Protestant voice of Sproul, the canon was not infallibly selected.
Therefore it may contain error. That’s an unsettling thought, because
if Protestantism is true, the Bible is all we’ve got.
Note: Will you live by the Word of God or by the traditions of the Catholic Church?
But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread
alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’” Matthew
4:4.
MAIN INDEX
BIBLE INDEX
HINDU INDEX
MUSLIM
INDEX
MORMON INDEX
BUDDHISM INDEX
WORD FAITH INDEX
WATCHTOWER INDEX
MISCELLANEOUS INDEX
CATHOLIC CHURCH INDEX