Critique of THE PROTESTANT'S DILEMMA by Devin Rose
Chapter 13 - Interpretive Authority
Page 95:
At the root of the endemic divisions within Protestantism lies the
absence (and by definition, the impossibility) of an interpretive
authority for Scripture above that of the individual Christian.
Protestants cannot accept that any person or group has this power,
because the Bible itself has to be the ultimate authority. Ideally,
Protestants would be united in their interpretation of the Bible; but
as we have seen, from the beginning of Protestantism this has not been
the case. This lack of unity leads inevitably to the principle of
private judgment, which makes each believer’s interpretation will be at
least partly wrong, because no believer is infallible.
Note: God gave individuals to help Christians grow in the Christian faith through love.
And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some
evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the
saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of
Christ, till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge
of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of
the fullness of Christ; that we should no longer be children, tossed to
and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery
of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, but, speaking
the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the
head—Christ— from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what
every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every
part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of
itself in love. Ephesians 4:11-16.
Note: Abiding in Jesus Christ will help eliminate false doctrines by deceitful men.
Pages 95-96: A valid question
to ask a Protestant is: How do you know that your interpretation of the
Bible is correct, against the (perhaps contradictory) interpretation of
any other Protestant? The short answer is, he doesn’t know for sure.
And he would probably consider it dangerously cult-like to claim
otherwise. But why would the Holy Spirit guide different Christians to
different interpretations?
Note: Christians should interpret Scriptures in context comparing like verses.
But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been
assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from
childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make
you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 2
Timothy 3:14-15.
Note: Have you placed your faith in Jesus Christ or a “magisterium”?
Page 97: The solution proposed
by most Protestants is that sin or human depravity causes even
Spirit-guided Christians to misunderstand God’s Word. But, as we have
seen, they argue that since most Protestants have come to generally
similar beliefs on most important issues, the Holy Spirit has managed
to create a basic consensus amid the confusion. Imagine many arrows
being shot at a target. Though the archers may not have perfect aim,
the Spirit corrects their shots in mid-flight and they mostly cluster
around the target. We’re resigned to personal interpretation, and that
interpretation will be fallible, but God makes sure that together we
get the big questions right in the end.
Note: False interpretations have been a problem from the beginning for Christians.
For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to
teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you
have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes
only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a
babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is,
those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both
good and evil. Hebrews 5:12-14.
Note: Abiding in Jesus Christ will help eliminate false doctrines by deceitful men.
Page 98: We can’t put the Bible
on the witness stand and tell it to give us the whole truth and nothing
but. In Protestantism, who is that “someone” who reads and interprets
the Bible with authority? Mathison says it’s “the Church.” And “the
Church” is found wherever the gospel is accurately proclaimed. But
Protestants determine the meaning of the gospel through their own
(fallible) personal interpretations of Scripture, creating a circular
argument: The Church has authority over the individual to interpret
Scripture, and you find the Church by first finding the gospel, but you
find the gospel through individual interpretation of Scripture. And
since all Protestants concede the fallibility of their interpretations,
the whole scheme is built on thin air and must come crashing down.
Note: The exercise of authority by Christians over Christians spiritually is ungodly.
But Jesus called them to Himself and said, “You know that the rulers of
the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise
authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever
desires to become great among you, let him be your servant. And whoever
desires to be first among you, let him be your slave— just as the Son
of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a
ransom for many.” Matthew 20:25-28.
Page 99: A Catholic can
certainly agree that, regardless of whether an infallible interpreter
exists, having an inerrant book is better than having an error-filled
book. An infallible interpreter, one that can be asked questions and
that can clarify its statements, is far superior – especially when
dealing with passages of Scripture that produce conflicting
interpretations. And that is exactly what we have in the Catholic
magisterium.
Note: The Catholic magisterium has changed like shifting sands over time.
The debate concerning the Magisterium, papal primacy and infallibility,
and the authority to teach in general has not lessened since the
official declaration of the doctrines. Instead, the Church has faced
contrary arguments; at one end there are those with the tendency to
regard even technically non-binding papal encyclicals as infallible
statements and, at the other, are those who refuse to accept in any
sense controversial encyclicals such as Humanae Vitae and who consider
the dogma of papal infallibility to be itself a fallible pronouncement.
The situation is complicated by changing attitudes toward authority in
an increasingly democratic world, the new importance placed on academic
freedom, and new means of knowledge and communication. In addition, the
authority of theologians is being revisited, with theologians pushing
past the structures laid out for them by Pius XII and Paul VI and
regarding themselves purely as academics, not in the service of any
institution. Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
Page 99: Christ founded the
Church, established the apostles as its rightful leaders, and promised
to send his Spirit to guide them until his return. Even in the first
century we see the apostles acting with authority, interpreting
Scripture and binding the faithful to their decisions. Only if they had
been established by divine authority would they have the right to do
this; the New Testament records that they did have that right. This
magisterium is found today in the Catholic Church, having continually
exercised the authority Christ gave it. Since the Church is fully
protected from error by the power and grace of God, the faithful can
fully assent to it, trusting that it accurately teaches God’s saving
truth.
Note: The Apostle Paul chose not to exercise authority over Christians.
For you yourselves know how you ought to follow us, for we were not
disorderly among you; nor did we eat anyone’s bread free of charge, but
worked with labor and toil night and day, that we might not be a burden
to any of you, not because we do not have authority, but to make
ourselves an example of how you should follow us. 2 Thessalonians 3:7-9.
Note: The exercise of authority by Christians over Christians spiritually is ungodly.
MAIN INDEX
BIBLE INDEX
HINDU INDEX
MUSLIM
INDEX
MORMON INDEX
BUDDHISM INDEX
WORD FAITH INDEX
WATCHTOWER INDEX
MISCELLANEOUS INDEX
CATHOLIC CHURCH INDEX