MUSLIM POLITICS
1) Muslim politics dictates the shedding of blood for
Allah.
Qur'an 2:244 And fight in the way of Allah, and know that
Allah is Hearing, Knowing.
Conclusion: Bloodshed is common in and around Islamic countries.
2) Local Muslim politics demand revenge by a family member.
Qur'an 2:178 O you who believe, retaliation is prescribed for
you in the matter of the slain: the free for the free, and the
slave for the slave, and the female for the female. But if remission
is made to one by his brother, prosecution should be according to
usage, and payment to him in a good manner. This is an alleviation
from your Lord and a mercy. Whoever exceeds the limit after this,
will have a painful chastisement.
Conclusion: The are many blood feuds between Muslim tribes.
3) Other religions are condemned by Mo-ham-mad through false
prophecy.
Qur'an 3:185 You will certainly be tried in your property
and your persons. And you will certainly hear from those who
have been given the Book before you and from the idolaters much
abuse. And if you are patient and keep your duty, surely this
is an affair of great resolution.
Conclusion: There is no toleration of other religions in an
Islamic country.
4) An Islamic dictator must be kind and tolerate those who
trust Allah.
Qur'an 3:158 Thus it is by Allah's mercy that you are
gentle to them. And had you been rough, hard-hearted, they would
certainly have dispersed from around you. So pardon them and
ask protection for them, and consult them in important matters.
But when you have determined, put your trust in Allah. Surely
Allah loves those who trust in Him.
Conclusion: There are no true Islamic countries that are
democracies.
5) For an Islamic dictator to prosper he needs to glorify Allah
on a regular basis.
Qur'an 38:17-20 Bear patiently what they say, and remember Our
servant David, the possessor of power. He ever turned to Allah. Truly
We made the mountains subject to him, glorifying Allah at
nightfall and sunrise, and the birds gathered together. All were
obedient to him. And We strengthened his kingdom and We gave him
wisdom and a clear judgment.
Conclusion: Ideally, a Muslim cleric should rule an
Islamic country per Mo-ham-mad.
6) Muslims are to submit to the ruling Islamic dictator to
achieve Muslim domination.
Qur'an 4:59 O you who believe, obey Allah and obey the
Messenger and those in authority from among you; then if you
quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you
believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is best and more suitable
to achieve the end.
Conclusion: There will be no political debates or elections in
an true Islamic country.
7) Peace treaties with Islamic countries are not valid unless
signed in Mecca.
Qur'an 9:7 How can there be an agreement for the idolaters with
Allah and with His Messenger, except those with whom you made an
agreement at the Sacred Mosque? So as long as they are true to
you, be true to them. Surely Allah loves those who keep their duty.
Conclusion: Muslims will break peace treaties on a regular
basis.
Final Conclusion: There is no real peace in an Islamic country
for anyone.
The Muslim World Interview with Gulen
Quran Cannot be Reduced to Political Discourse
09.17.2005 Saturday - ISTANBUL 18:33
Question: In a time when political Islam has become very popular, what
are your thoughts on the relationship between Islam and politics?
In my opinion, people have either gone too far or not far enough with
regard to understanding the relationship between Islam and politics.
Some have said that the religion of Islam has no relationship with
politics; others have perceived the religion as politics itself,
ignoring the varied and rich aspects of religion. In the Holy Qur’an,
there are verses concerning administration and politics. The Prophet’s
practices also occupy an important place in this regard. For example,
the Qur’anic terms “ulu al-amr” (those who rule), “ita'at” (obedience
to the rulers), “shura” (consultation), “harb” (war), and “sulh”
(peace), are all examples of some Qur’anic references with regard to
political and legal decisions. In addition, there are Qur’anic verses
related to legal institutions and also some that point to politics and
governing.
However, in Islam it is not possible to limit the concept of governance
and politics into a single paradigm, unlike the principles of faith and
the pillars of Islam. History shows us that in the Islamic world, since
the time of the Prophet, there have been many types of states. This is
so even if we exclude the elections in the early period of Islam and
the qualities that were exhibited in those elections. Even if one
cannot see some major methodological differences among these types of
governance, there are many differences in the details.
Those who are not aware of the principles of these different methods of
governing have understood each of them as a separate system. I have to
note that these differences were the result of the aspects of religion
that are open to interpretation and related to the field of independent
reasoning (Ijtihad).
In order to reach a healthy understanding and come to positive
conclusions, one should refer to the main sources of Islam: the Qur’an
and the Sunnah. There is no doubt that historical experiences are also
an important source.
In the Qur’an, besides verses related to human relationships with God,
there are many other verses regulating the relationships of human
beings with one another. The source of both kinds of verses is one,
Allah. The verses that remind us about our duties and responsibilities
to the divine essence have been preserved in its originality based on
the understanding of the Prophet and his companions. The Qur’anic
verses and prophetic sayings related to the second category focus on
the principles of humans’ social, economic, political, and cultural
life. At the same time, they hint at some wisdom, betterment, and
benefits through their brief ending statements at the end of many
verses. For instance, the verses on justice, respect for rights,
truthfulness, being compassionate and merciful, carrying out actions
based on consultation, living a chaste life, and not deceiving anyone
are considered examples of this category.
These kinds of verses that are directed to human relationships, if read
thoroughly and correctly, will give some hints for Muslims about how to
solve their future problems. Interpreters and the “Mujtahids” (those
who are able to perform independent reasoning), to a certain extent,
take this category as a reference point for their interpretations and
analyses.
There are many topics in the Qur’an and in the sayings of the Prophet
whose relevance to human experiences continues to come to light as time
passes. The details of such issues have been entrusted to the passing
of time.
The divine commands and prophetic suggestions about politics, the
state, and ruling the community have been interpreted in diverse ways,
resulting in different manifestations and various forms throughout
history. You can relate this aspect of religion, if you wish, according
to the concept that time is a great interpreter, or as an indication of
the universalism of Islam, which is also known as the natural and
tolerant religion (al-hanifiyyah-al-samha’). Yes, among the addressees
of the Qur’an there were various groups of people: from Bedouins to
civilized people, undeveloped communities to very developed nations,
and simple masses to wonderfully organized and enlightened societies.
The Qur’an has addressed all these groups considering their own
understandings, approaches, views, evaluations, and even lives.
In the case of human relationship to the divine Being, it has given
brief explanations leaving the details for the coming generations. In
the case of human-to-human interactions, it has detailed and explained
the specifics of some well-established principles.
In this regard, there has been a consensus of understanding on this
first case with the exception of some heretical groups’ interpretations
of the Islamic tradition. As for the second case, there have been many
varying interpretations in accordance with the conditions, time, and
the situations existing in the world. Naturally, these differences have
been reflected in the judicial and administrative institutions.
It would not be a correct understanding of Islam to claim that politics
is a vital principle of religion and among its well-established
pillars. While some Qur’anic verses are related to politics, the
structure of the state, and the forms of ruling, people who have
connected the import of the Qur’anic message with such issues may have
caused a misunderstanding. This misunderstanding is the result of their
Islamic zeal, their limitations of their consideration solely of
historical experiences, and their thinking that the problems of Islamic
communities can be solved more easily through politics and ruling. All
of these approaches within their own contexts are meaningful. However,
the truth does not lie in these approaches alone.
Although one cannot ignore the effects of ruling and administration in
regulating communal relationships between individuals, families and
societies, yet these, within the framework of Qur’anic values, are
considered secondary issues. That is because the values that we call
major principles (ummuhat), such as faith (iman), submission (islam),
doing what is beautiful (ihsan), and the acceptance of divine morals by
the community, are references that form the essence of administrative,
economic, and political issues. The Qur’an is a translation of the book
of the universe, which comes from the divine commands of creation, an
interpretation of the world of the unseen, of the visible and
invisible. It is an explanation of the reflections of the divine names
on earth and in the heavens. It is a prescription for the various
problems of the Islamic world. It is a unique guide for bliss in this
life and in the life to come. It is a great guide for the travelers in
this world moving towards the hereafter. It is an inexhaustible source
of wisdom. Such a book should not be reduced to the level of political
discourse, nor should it be considered a book about political theories
or forms of state. To consider the Qur’an as an instrument of political
discourse is a great disrespect for the Holy Book and is an obstacle
that prevents people from benefiting from this deep source of divine
grace.
There is no doubt that the holy Qur’an, through its enrichment of the
human soul, is able to inspire wise politicians and through them to
prevent politics from being like gambling or merely a game of chess.
Note: The Muslim holy book will always be their source of political administration. Thus Islam is contrary to western thought.
Islamist
who claimed killing British soldiers was 'justified' becomes director
of a controversial Muslim pressure group with influence over Westminster
• Azad Ali is head of community at Muslim Engagement and Development (Mend)
• He lost a libel action after newspapers said he was 'a hardline Islamic extremist'
• Mr Ali told Facebook followers that Westminster attack was 'not terrorism'
• He said Khalid Masood was a 'lone wolf' - The Met is treating it as an act of terror
• Mr Ali's lawyers say that he considered it 'a barbarous and cruel act of murder'
By Martin Robinson, Uk Chief Reporter For Mailonline
10 April 2017
An extremist who said he supported the killing of British soldiers has
been appointed a director of a controversial Muslim pressure group with
influence at Westminster.
Azad Ali, head of community development and engagement at Muslim
Engagement and Development (Mend), said the Westminster Bridge attack
last month was 'not terrorism'.
Mr Ali said on Facebook that Khalid Masood, who murdered PC Keith
Palmer and four pedestrians, should referred to as 'a lone wolf'. The
Met Police has been treating it as a terror attack.
He also said that the Government's fury with WhatsApp for giving
terrorists 'a place to hide' was ministers 'trying to invade more of
our privacy', according to The Times.
His Facebook post came after it emerged that Masood had used the
messaging service two minutes before he ploughed into at least 50
people with a 4X4 before stabbing PC Palmer to death.
Mr Ali has previously lost a libel action against several newspapers
that said he was 'a hardline Islamic extremist who supports the killing
of British and American soldiers in Iraq by fellow Muslims as
justified'.
Mr Ali's lawyers at Carter-Ruck said his comments on the Westminster
Bridge attack were 'referring to terrorism in the sense of organised
acts co-ordinated by terrorist groups'.
His legal teams also said Mr Ali considered it 'a barbarous and cruel
act of murder for which there was no possible justification or
mitigation'.
In 2009 it emerged that Mr Ali, then an IT worker and president of the
Civil Service Islamic Society, was suspended on full pay for six months
following comments on his blog.
In one post Mr Ali quoted an interview with an Islamic militant who
said: 'If I saw an American or British man wearing a soldier's uniform
inside Iraq I would kill him because that is my obligation.
'If I found the same soldier in Jordan I wouldn't touch him. In Iraq he
is a fighter and an occupier, here he is not. I respect this as the
main instruction in my religion for jihad.'
Sir Gus O'Donnell, then Britain's most senior civil servant and patron
of the Civil Service Islamic Society, ordered that Mr Ali be suspended
while an investigation was carried out.
Six months later the investigation finished and Mr Ali returned to his job.
His group Mend works with politicians on all sides, the police and the
CPS to enhance the engagement of British Muslims in UK life.
Today The Times made a number of claims about the organisation.
It said that Labour's Yasmin Qureshi, the shadow justice minister,
accepted a £5,000 donation from Mend's founder Sufyan Ismail - but
failed to name him as the donor.
The newspaper also claims that The Charity Commission will speak to three charities over their funding of Mend speaking events.
At one an Islamic speaker considered to have extreme views told the
audience that killing comes easily to 'the children of Israel'.
The Times also claims that Mend targeted the NSPCC and used social
media to send them angry messages because the children's charity set up
a hotline for families to report children if they feared they were
being radicalised.
Mend relies on donations for funding and online it quotes the Koran
saying: 'And whatsoever you spend of anything (in Allah's Cause), He
will replace it'.
Malaysian MP: OK for rapists to marry victims, even 9-year-olds can
Asia One
April 4, 2017
KUALA LUMPUR - There is nothing wrong with a rape victim marrying the
rapist, according to a Barisan Nasional lawmaker who even suggested
that some nine-year-olds were "physically and spiritually" ready for
marriage. Tasek Gelugor MP Datuk Shabudin Yahaya, in trying to refute
Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud (Amanah-Kota Raja), said that some 12- and
15-year-old girls looked older than their actual ages.
"When we discuss 12- and 15-year-olds, we don't see their physical
bodies because some children aged 12 or 15, their bodies are like
18-year-old women," Shabudin told the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday.
The former Syariah court judge added that some girls who reached
puberty when they were as young as nine years old were "physically and
spiritually" ready for marriage.
"So it's not impossible for them to get married," Shabudin said, adding
that there was "nothing wrong" with a rape victim marrying the rapist
as it could serve as a "remedy" to the increasing number of social
problems.
Shabudin said this when debating the Sexual Offences Against Children
Bill 2017 after several Opposition lawmakers suggested amending it to
include child marriages as an offence.
He said that although rape is a criminal offence, the rapist and the
victim should be "given a second chance to turn a new leaf in life".
"Perhaps through marriage they can lead a healthier, better life. And
the person who was raped does not necessarily have a bleak future. She
will have a husband, at least, and this could serve as a remedy to
growing social problems," he said.
Dr Siti Mariah, however, argued that allowing the rapist to marry the victim would not guarantee a better life.
"I don't agree with marrying off the victim to the rapist. If the
rapist repents, maybe that's fine, but what if the husband is 'haprak'
(useless)?" she said.
Teo Nie Ching (DAP-Kulai) cited two cases of the victims marrying the
attackers, and argued that the marriages ended up becoming more
problematic, causing more hurt.
She said that one of the cases involved a 35-year-old man in Negri
Sembilan who married a 14-year-old with a disability after allegedly
raping her. The man then reportedly raped his 11-year-old sister-in-law
and forced his wife to film him committing the act.
Citing his experience as a judge, Shabudin, however, said that Teo
should not generalise the issue as there have been many cases where
such marriages did not end in divorce.
"The girl becomes safer when she is married rather than when she is
left alone. Don't assume they (rapists) remain bad people," he said.
Teo's motion to amend the Sexual Offences Against Children Bill to
include child marriages as an offence was ultimately defeated by a
voice vote.
Hamas and Fatah seek another truce after 17 are killed
It is the deadliest day in the fight for the Palestinian territories.
By IBRAHIM BARZAK
Saturday, February 3, 2007
The Associated Press
GAZA CITY, Gaza StripFatah and Hamas gunmen battled each other across
the Gaza Strip on Friday, killing 17 people in the deadliest single day
of their struggle for control of the Palestinian government.
Gazans huddled in homes to escape the crossfire, which has killed a
total of 24 people and wounded 245 since fighting erupted on Thursday.
Hospital officials said were running out of blood to treat the wounded.
By afternoon, leaders of Hamas and Fatah said they had agreed to a
cease-fire, but needed to work out the details of a pullback of forces
who were battling in the streets with mortar shells, rockets and heavy
guns.
"We … agreed with God's help on a cease-fire," said Nizar Rayan of
Hamas. "The measures that will be taken on the ground will be discussed
in the next few hours." A Fatah spokesman, Abdel Hakim Awad, confirmed
agreement was reached in principle.
An earlier truce unraveled after just two days.
More than 100 Palestinians have been killed since Hamas won elections last year and formed a Cabinet.
Hamas has established its own militia as a counterweight to the
security forces controlled by President Mahmoud Abbas. The forces have
fought repeatedly.
Fatah forces raided a Hamas stronghold Friday, the Islamic University
in Gaza City, setting fire to two buildings and sparking a heavy
firefight with Hamas forces.
Hamas gunmen vowed revenge, and hours later, group members attacked two
buildings of the Fatah-affiliated Al-Quds University, Palestinian
security officials said.
Meanwhile, Israeli troops killed two armed Palestinians near the West
Bank city of Ramallah early Friday. Palestinian security officials said
the men were police officers on a routine patrol.
Islam is religion and politics
Gates of Vienna July 07 2008
By Alf Ronnby, Associate Professor, University of Gothenburg
Europe was been
invaded by Muslim armies and Muslim civilians for hundreds of years.
Therefore it is
not strange that there exists a great deal of mistrust towards Muslims. Muhammad
created the doctrine of holy war, jihad, in 610. His successors succeeded with
holy war. Ten years after the death of Muhammad in 632 the Muslim armies lead by
Abu Bakr had conquered large parts of the old Roman Empire in North Africa and
the Middle east. Islam became a world power.
In 711 the Muslims
crossed the strait of Gibraltar and conquered huge parts of the Iberian
peninsula. By 732 they had advanced deep into France, but were defeated by Karl
Martel’s army at Poitiers. The Muslims established the khalifa al-Andalus
(Arabic Spain). It had its best days in the 10th century. In 1100 the Christians
began to reconquer what had been lost, and in 1492 the last Muslim bastion in
Spain, Granada, fell. A ‘reconquest’ of al-Andalus stands as a wet dream for
certain Muslims today. Islamic violence in Spain has to be observed in this
light.
In the east,
Byzantium was under constant attack from Muslim armies for 800 years until
Constantinople fell in 1453 and the whole of southern Europe was Islamized. The
Islamic expansion continued in Europe, but the Muslim siege of Vienna in 1683
went wrong. It became a turning point, and after that Christian armies forced
the Muslim empire in Eastern Europe back.
Even so, however,
Islam is dominant in certain regions of the Balkans. Of the whole Ottoman Empire
only Spain, Portugal, and Hungary (as well as some Balkan states) are no longer
Muslim.
Islam is described
as a religion that prohibits violence. But that is either a truth with some
modifications, or else pure hypocrisy. The Quran forbids violence, but hails
holy war. It is a double standard, as Muhammad showed himself when he defended
the violence that benefited his own interests and conquests. Allah is described
as the mighty killer of the infidels.
Palestinians Between Nationalism and Islam
By Raphael Israeli
Vallentine Mitchell
July, 2008
The Palestinians
are at war. But their war is not only against Israel. The two most prominent
Palestinian factions, Hamas and Fatah, continue to battle on the streets of Gaza
and the West Bank.
But the war does
not end there. There is also a war for the soul of the Palestinian people, notes
the prolific Hebrew University Prof. Raphael Israeli, in his newest book,
Palestinians Between Nationalism and Islam.
Unfortunately,
the Islamists are winning. They are exhorted to violence by the bulk of the
Muslim world, which is steeped in the muck of radical Islam and the ossified
ideas of authoritarian rule.
Only very slowly
have moderates emerged from the shadows in Tunisia, Qatar, Iran and elsewhere to
challenge this culture of violence. In some cases, these moderates are
imprisoned for their courage. The courage of outspoken Palestinians, such as
Nabil Amr, can result in life-threatening injury (he was shot by gunmen in
Ramallah in 2004), or even death (many Palestinians have been summarily killed
on charges of "collaboration").
The result is
that the violence continues. "Islamikaze" violence, as Israeli terms it, is a
virus that spreads quickly throughout the Muslim world. However, criticism is
slowly seeping in, and challenging a system of ideas that the West hopes is
doomed to fail.
Drawing from
previously published essays, Israeli's book explores the dueling rhetoric
between Hamas and Fatah leaders in the Palestinian territories. Even before the
collapse of the Oslo peace process, the language of Islamism had become a tool
to garner support on the Palestinian street. Indeed, Yasser Arafat found that
even while he negotiated peace with Israel, he needed to wield the vitriolic
language of his Islamist foes as a means to maintain legitimacy in a violent
culture, thus blurring the line between state and religion in the still-forming
Palestinian identity. Even Palestinian women have wielded this rhetoric in their
bid to play a role in the "liberation of Palestine."
The author, a
noted expert on the disaffected yet demographically significant Arab Israelis,
observes that this population of some one million is undergoing a similar
process. Their citizenship in the Jewish state makes their struggle even more
complex.
Israeli explores
several ways in which the Palestinians have failed to advance toward statehood,
and still other roads this embattled people may yet take.
Notably, he
states that "exactly as there are many Arab settlements within Israel proper,
there is no reason that Jewish settlements cannot exist within the densely
populated Arab areas." Such compromises will not be made, however, so long as
the intransigent language of Islamism dominates the public square.
The writer, a
former US Treasury intelligence analyst, is director of policy for the Jewish
Policy Center and author of the forthcoming book
Hamas vs Fatah: The Struggle for Palestine (Palgrave, November 2008).