Moslems Censor American Speech
By James Atticus Bowden

Aug 31, 2005


Right after 9-11 Moslems insisted on being called Muslims. Woe unto the American who used the former name. Recently, the Mohammedans won a coup getting a conservative talk show host, Michael Graham, fired from WMAL-AM, an ABC Radio affiliate. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), otherwise known as the ‘Corrupting America for Islamic Rule’, will expand bias bullying to censor the truth on other stations and generally throughout public speech.

Graham said,  “Because of the mix of Islamic theology that—rightly or wrongly—is interpreted to promote violence, added to an organizational structure that allows violent radicals to operate openly in Islam's name with impunity, Islam has, sadly, become a terrorist organization.  It pains me to say it. But the good news is it doesn't have to stay this way, if the vast majority of Muslims who don't support terror will step forward and reclaim their religion."

He added, “If the Boy Scouts of America had 1,000 scout troops, and 10 of them practiced suicide bombings, then the BSA would be considered a terrorist organization.  If the BSA refused to kick out those 10 troops, that would make the case even stronger.  If people defending terror repeatedly turned to the Boy Scout Handbook and found language that justified and defended murder – and the scoutmasters in charge simply said ‘Could be’ – the Boy Scouts would have been driven out of America long ago.”

That cost Graham his job.  Over 15,000 protest calls to support him didn’t help.   The Muslims got Graham for telling the truth.  It’s going to get a lot worse.  More Americans must speak in public with a lot more of the painful truth of Islam.  This historical truth is so politically incorrect it shouts down the public pandering from the President down to not dare offend oh-so-sensitive Muslims.

Like, Islam is a (or do they insist it is ‘the’?) Religion of Peace.  If Islam is a Religion of Peace then Aztec Paganism was the Religion of Mercy.  Muslims are behind the Communists, but ahead of the Nazis, for mass murders, individual martyrdom and religious war killing.  Roman Catholicism’s Spanish Inquisition is cited as a counter-vailing Christian horror, but it’s nothing (estimates of 32,000 deaths, but the actual records indicate about 2,000 deaths) compared to body count that begin when Mohammed ordered the massacre, genocide, of a Jewish tribe just 5 years after starting his religion (627 A.D.)

Muslim armies killed, raped, and destroyed more in their conquests against Christians, Pagans and Hindus than all the Crusades put together.  Even during the ‘Golden Age’ of Islam of the 10-13th centuries, there was mob violence, forced conversions, mass murder and expulsions against Christians and Jews from Spain to Iran.  Ask the Armenians about Muslim tolerance in the 2oth Century.  With this century in its infancy, how many hundreds of thousands of Christians have been killed in the Sudan, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Kosovo, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Philippines and Indonesia?  What religion did the child murderers of Beslan, Russia proclaim last September?  Have Americans no eyes, no ears, no memory, no history of facts?

If Graham was fired for lightly grazing the truth about Islam, who will get a microphone or camera to tell these greater truths?

Like, Islam is NOT an Abrahimic religion equal to Judaism and Christianity. Muslims will say they’re people of the ‘Book’ and point to Koranic verses to support the claim. But, Muslims have other verses and teach to the contrary. Moreover, why would the God of the Jews and Christians dictate in the Koran that Muslims should persecute, kill or make the Jews and Christians pay taxes and be second class citizens?

And Islamic Civilization is 800 years behind Western Civilization.  By any measure that you mark Islam is as far behind the West as the Germanic Tribes were behind Rome.  Islamic Civilization is barbaric compared to West. Truth isn’t Islamophobia.

Claiming the Koran is more than the truth, that the very pages are holy, fits a religion that borrowed from the paganism of Baal - from the black stone Ka’aba to their old moon god symbol and name of Allah.  It’s what you expect when an illiterate Mohammed makes up a religion/state/society from what he hears of paganism, Judaism, and Christianity.

History must be ‘outed’, like Mohammad consummating the marriage of his last additional wife when she was 9 years old. Pedophile for Prophet? Islam is the peace of submission for followers, the enforced peace of suppression, and the final peace of the dead victims.


Enforce Islamic Law in Canada?

by Daniel Pipes
New York Sun
September 27, 2005

In 1991, the Canadian province of Ontario passed what seemed at the time to be an enlightened, multicultural piece of legislation. Called the Arbitration Act, it stipulates that if two parties agree to engage a commercial, religious, or other arbitrator to settle a civil dispute, the provincial authorities will then enforce the verdict, so long as it is in accord with Canadian law.

"People can use any arbitrator they want and can use a religious framework if it is mutually acceptable," notes Brendan Crawley, spokesman for the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. "If the award is not compatible with Canadian law, then the court will not enforce it. You can't agree to violate Canadian law."

Over the years, Jews, Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mennonites, and aboriginals, among others, made use of arbitration to settle family law questions without using Ontario's court system. The system quietly worked. "If there have been any problems flowing from any rabbinical court decisions, I'm not aware of them," observed the Ontario region chairman of the Canadian Jewish Congress, Joel Richler.

Then, in October 2003, an organization called the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice proposed the creation of Muslim Arbitration Boards (internally, it used Islamic terminology for these, Darul-Qada). As explained by the institute's founder, Syed Mumtaz Ali, the boards, arbitrating on the basis of Islamic law, the Sharia, would permit a Muslim to live according to Islam's "complete code of life."

A first news article on this initiative came out in November 2003; within days, prompted by ("Canada prepares to enforce Islamic law"), a huge dispute got going. A hitherto obscure Ontario provision prompted a sharp national debate and even street rallies in twelve Canadian and European cities.

Interestingly, the main opposition came from Muslim women's groups, who feared that ignorant, isolated females would submit to the inescapably misogynistic Sharia, a law code that permits parents to marry off pre-pubescent girls, men to marry multiple women, husbands alone to divorce, fathers automatically to win custody of children over certain ages, and sons to inherit more than daughters.

The anti-Sharia campaign succeeded. On Sep. 11 – after almost two years of public debate – the premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, held that religious-based arbitrations "threaten our common ground." He announced that "There will be no Sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians."

His decision means that faith-based arbitration can continue to operate, as it did long before 1991, but the government will no longer enforce its verdicts.

Anti-Sharia forces were of course jubilant. "That was the best news I have ever heard for the past five years," said Homa Arjomand. "We're still in disbelief. But it's such good news. It's remarkable," commented Nuzhat Jafri. "I'm just thrilled!" reacted Tarek Fatah (before he began receiving death threats).

McGuinty's decision has a catch, however. Acting on the correct premise that Islam must be treated the same as other religions, he determined that if Muslims cannot enjoy state enforcement of faith-based arbitration, neither can anyone else. Therefore, McGuinty said, his government would "as soon as possible" introduce legislation to repeal the Arbitration Act of 1991.

This side-effect prompted a pained reaction from those who would lose state enforcement of their arbitration decisions. Richler denounced it as a "knee-jerk reaction against the Sharia issue." Rabbi Reuben Poupko of Montreal added, sadly, "the Ontario government felt compelled to throw the baby with the bath water."

That Orthodox Jews and others might lose out points to an emerging pattern, whereby efforts to integrate Muslims into the West upset a benign status quo. Other recent examples:

  Muslims do not recognize the freedom of speech for non-Muslims.