MORMON RACISM
Journal of
Discourses, 26 vols., 7:, p.291
Remarks
by
President Brigham Young, delivered in the Tabernacle, Great Salt Lake City,
October 9, 1859.
Reported by G. D.
Watt.
You see some classes of the human family
that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild,
and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is
generally bestowed upon mankind. The first man that committed the odious crime
of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the
children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that
would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be,
and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace
mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the
same race-that they should be the "servant of servants;" and they will be, until
that curse is removed; and the Abolitionists cannot help it, nor in the least
alter that decree. How long is that race to endure the dreadful curse that is
upon them? That curse will remain upon them, and they never can hold the
Priesthood or share in it until all the other descendants of Adam have received
the promises and enjoyed the blessings of the Priesthood and the keys thereof.
Until the last ones of the residue of Adam's children are brought up to that
favourable position, the children of Cain cannot receive the first ordinances of
the Priesthood. They were the first that were cursed, and they will be the last
from whom the curse will be removed. When the residue of the family of Adam come
up and receive their blessings, then the curse will be removed from the seed of
Cain, and they will receive blessings in like proportion.
1 Nephi 11:8 And it came to pass that the Spirit said unto
me: Look! And I looked and beheld a tree; and it was like unto the
tree which my father had seen; and the beauty thereof was far beyond,
yea, exceeding of all beauty; and the whiteness thereof did
exceed the whiteness of the driven snow.
1 Nephi 11:13 And I beheld the city of Nazareth; and in the city
of Nazareth I beheld a virgin, and she was exceedingly fair and
white.
1 Nephi 12:23 And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had
dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy
people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. (Joe
Smith calls dark skinned people ugly, filthy, lazy, and perverts.)
1 Nephi 13:15 And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was
upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their
inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly
fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain.
2 Nephi 5:21 For behold, they had hardened their hearts against
him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they
were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they
might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin
of blackness to come upon them.
2 Nephi 30:6 And then shall they rejoice; for they shall know that
it is a blessing unto them from the hand of God; and their scales of
darkness shall begin to fall from their eyes; and many generations
shall not pass away among them, save they shall be a pure
white (1830 edition) and a delightsome people.
Jacob 3:8 O my brethren, I fear that unless ye shall repent of
your sins that their skins will be whiter than yours, when ye
shall be brought with them before the throne of God.
Alma 3:6 And the skins of the Lamanites were dark,
according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was
a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion
against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob, and
Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men.
3 Nephi 2:15 And their curse was taken from them, and their
skin became white like unto the Nephites.
Mormon 5:15 And also that the seed of this people may more fully
believe his gospel, which shall go forth unto them from the Gentiles;
for this people shall be scattered, and shall become a dark, a
filthy, and a loathsome people, beyond the description of that
which ever hath been amongst us, yea, even that which hath been among
the Lamanites, and this because of their unbelief and
idolatry.
Church removes racial references in Book of Mormon headings
By Peggy Fletcher Stack
The Salt Lake Tribune
Published Dec 17, 2010
The LDS Church has made subtle — but significant — changes to chapter
headings in its online version of the faith’s signature scripture, The
Book of Mormon, toning down some earlier racial allusions.
The words “skin of blackness” were removed from the introductory
italicized summary in 2 Nephi, Chapter 5, in describing the “curse” God
put on disbelieving Lamanites.
Deeper into the volume, in Mormon, Chapter 5, the heading changes from
calling Lamanites “a dark, filthy, and loathsome people” to “because of
their unbelief, the Lamanites will be scattered, and the Spirit will
cease to strive with them.”
In both cases, the text itself remains unchanged.
Members of the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
believe founder Joseph Smith unearthed a set of gold plates from a hill
in upstate New York in 1827 and translated the ancient text into
English. The account, known as The Book of Mormon, first published in
1830, primarily tells the story of God’s dealings with two Israelite
civilizations living in the New World. One derived from a single family
who fled Jerusalem in 600 B.C. and eventually splintered into two
groups, known as Nephites and Lamanites.
Since that initial printing, millions of copies have been distributed throughout the world in more than 160 languages.
Chapter summaries were added in the 1920s, then rewritten by the late
LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie in 1981. That same year, a verse that
used “white and delightsome” to describe what will happen to
dark-skinned peoples when they repent was changed to “pure and
delightsome.”
Critics argued the change was made to address allegations of racism,
since the Utah-based faith had a racial policy that, until 1978, barred
blacks from being ordained to the church’s all-male priesthood.
Not so, said Royal
Skousen, a linguistics professor at Brigham Young University, who has noted
every change in the scriptural text from 1830 to the present. Skousen said Smith
himself changed “white” to “pure” in 1840, but left it elsewhere in the book.
“Eight other verses
still use the phrase,” Skousen said. “If the [church] was just responding to
sensitivities, why wouldn’t they have changed all the other ones?” (still a
racist church)
A decade later, the
faith’s governing First Presidency approved minor changes to some Book of Mormon
chapter headings, explained church spokesman Michael Purdy.
The tweaks described
above were made in several foreign editions, including Portuguese, Spanish and
German translations. The original headings remained in most English editions
until 2004, when Doubleday published the first trade version of the LDS
scripture and implemented the editing.
Until this month, the
1981 headings remained in the church’s online version at
lds.org. When the church upgraded its website, the Doubleday changes were
included online. The former version will continue — for now — in the printed
English versions.
“When these types of
changes are made, they are rolled out to various online and print editions as
they become available,” Purdy said in a statement. “A new English edition of The
Book of Mormon is not scheduled to be printed at present. Since these changes
are so minor, it is not necessary to include them until it is printed.”
Nathan Richardson, a
BYU graduate student at the time of the Doubleday edition, noticed some changes
and decided to do a side-by-side comparison.
Richardson, now a
speech therapist and book designer in Orem, concluded that the changes were done
for “clarity, a change in emphasis and to stick closer to the scriptural
language.” (His study can be seen at
ldsphilosopher.com)
Skousen, editor of a
2009 Yale edition of The Book of Mormon, sees the heading changes as a nod to
contemporary readers.
LDS officials don’t
want readers to focus on the kind of “overt statements about race that were in
McConkie’s 1981 summaries,” he said. “There is a [personal] interpretation
simply by what you choose to put in them. It’s not a question of dishonesty or
trying to hide things.”
The online headings
also change many words from a more archaic to a modern language, Skousen said.
“Given our times, I think they did the right thing.”
To Grant Hardy, an LDS
historian at the University of North Carolina in Asheville who edited a
“reader’s edition” of The Book of Mormon in 2005, the changes are interesting.
“Headings do give
readers a preview, a take on how to interpret what happens,” Hardy said. “The
church is clearly downplaying the ‘skin of blackness.’ ”
Still, Hardy does not
believe racist views are unusually prominent in the Mormon scripture.
“Even though this gets
a lot of attention, there aren’t that many verses that talk about skin color,”
Hardy said. “Race is not a main theme of The Book of Mormon. When it is talking
about Lamanites, it is mostly cultural and spiritual differences.”
There is a “temptation
to read ancient texts in terms of modern suppositions,” he said. “Probably
everybody in history was racist in terms of modern America.”
Does Hardy think the
Nephites were racist? Well, yes, he said, but that would not be surprising.
Downplaying that
element, Hardy said, “probably fits The Book of Mormon better overall.”
Brief history of blacks in Utah
The Salt Lake Tribune
Updated: 01/18/2009
1824-26 -- Black
mountain man James P. Beckwourth travels through Utah.
1847 -- Green
Flake drives Brigham Young's wagon into the Salt Lake Valley. Two other black
pioneers are part of the initial Mormon migration.
1850 -- Census
reports 50 blacks in Utah -- 24 free, 26 slaves.
1852 --
Territorial Legislature recognizes legality of owning slaves.
1869 -- Two black
military units, dubbed "Buffalo Soldiers," patrol Utah.
1890 -- Trinity
African Methodist Episcopal Church opens in Salt Lake City.
1890s -- Several
black newspapers such as the Broad Ax and Utah Plain Dealer are
launched.
1919 -- NAACP
opens a Salt Lake City branch.
1921-- Mignon
Richmond is the first black to graduate from college in Utah.
1925 -- Mob
lynches black prisoner in Price.
1939 -- A
petition circulates calling for restricting blacks to one section of Salt Lake
City. The petition eventually is declared unconstitutional.
1945 -- World War
II brings many blacks to Utah bases.
Late 1940s --
Ella Fitzgerald is refused by whites-only hotels in Salt Lake City.
1950 -- Ruby
Price becomes the first black schoolteacher in Utah.
1963 -- The
Legislature rescinds law prohibiting mixed-race marriage.
1969 -- Grover
Thompson is elected the University of Utah's first student-body president.
1976 -- The Rev.
Robert Harris is elected Utah's first black legislator.
1978 -- LDS
President Spencer W. Kimball announces that blacks can hold the priesthood.
1984 -- Tyrone
Medley is named Utah's first black judge.
1986 --
Legislation declares the third Monday of January as Human Rights Day. It later
is named Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
1993 -- 600 South
in Salt Lake City is renamed Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
1996 -- Grace
Sawyer Jones becomes the state's first black college president, taking the reins
at the College of Eastern Utah.
2001 -- South
Ogden's George Garwood us elected Utah's first black mayor.
Source: Tribune
archives
Mormonism’s Black Issues
By Joanna Brooks
October 25, 2009
While many Mormons would
like to forget the Church’s history of discrimination against blacks,
an Apostle’s recent statements comparing the post-Proposition 8 Mormon
backlash to the Civil Rights-era harassment of black voters have
brought that painful past back into the spotlight.
Mormon Apostle Dallin Oaks
chose a friendly audience deep within the Book-of-Mormon-belt for his
now controversial October 13 speech in defense of the Mormons’ ongoing
fight against same-sex civil marriage. Speaking to students at Brigham
Young University-Idaho, Oaks decried the continuing erosion of
religious freedom and the declining influence of religion in the public
sphere, before mounting a strongly-worded defense of “the ancient
order” of marriage against the “alleged ‘civil right’ of same-gender
couples to enjoy the privileges of marriage.”
Elder Oaks recalled
expressions of outrage directed at Mormons and acts of vandalism
against Mormon temples and wardhouses committed after the November 2008
passage of Proposition 8 outlawing same-sex marriage in California.
(Mormons, who make up 2% of California’s population, contributed more
than 50% of the individual donations to the Proposition 8 campaign and
a sizeable majority of its on-the-ground efforts.) The post-Proposition
8 backlash was, he stated, comparable to Civil Rights Movement-era
“voter intimidation of blacks in the South.”
Oaks, a former University
of Chicago law professor who clerked for United States Supreme Court
Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1957 and 1958 in the aftermath of the
Warren court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education (1954)
desegregation decision, knew that his black-Mormon comparison would
draw public attention. In fact, when he previewed his speech for an AP
reporter on October 12, he speculated that it might “be offensive to
some.”
Sure enough, commentators
from within (and without) the world of Mormonism have questioned the
soundness of Oaks’ analogy, asking whether Mormons in their effort to
eliminate same-sex marriage are more justly characterized as proponents
of religious freedom or opponents of gay human rights. In fact, four
Mormon gay rights groups issued a joint statement on October 16 urging
the Apostle to consider how the Mormon anti-gay marriage effort might
paradoxically compromise religious freedom for members of faiths that
recognize the sanctity of committed same-sex relationships.
But most of Oaks’
respondents politely sidestepped an even deeper paradox troubling his
black-Mormon analogy: the fact that Mormons have our own long and
peculiar history of discrimination against African Americans.
MSNBC commentator Keith
Olbermann alluded to this history when he gave Oaks his daily “worst
person in the world” award on October 14. Comparing the Proposition 8
Mormon backlash and the harassment of black voters was especially
inappropriate, Olbermann argued, because Mormons had been “on the wrong
side of integration.”
The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints prohibited individuals of African descent from
joining the Church’s lay priesthood (open to all devout Mormon men over
the age of twelve), serving as missionaries, or participating in Mormon
temple ordinances from 1849 until 1978, a fact that many Mormons today
find difficult to talk about or explain.
In the earliest years of
Mormon history, during the 1830s and 1840s, six or seven
African-American men including Elijah Abel (1808–1885) and Walker Lewis
(1798–1856) were ordained to the Church’s priesthood. But under the
leadership of Mormon Church president Brigham Young, the ordination of
African-American men ceased, African-American men and women were
prohibited from temple worship, and intermarriage was officially
discouraged.
Some historians believe
that Young’s about-face on the status of African Americans may have
been motivated by embarrassment stemming from an 1847 scandal involving
an excommunicated African-American Mormon named William McCary, or by
political pressures surrounding the extension of slavery to Utah
territory.
Whatever the actual
motivation for the priesthood ban, Mormons soon articulated a number of
working theological narratives to legitimate anti-African American
discrimination, drawing liberally from European and European-American
folk theologies that identified Africans and African Americans as the
descendents of Cain or Ham.
According to some Mormons,
the priesthood ban was an element of the curse placed upon Cain for
killing his brother Abel (Genesis 4), or the curse levied on Ham’s son
Canaan to punish Ham’s humiliation of his father, Noah (Genesis
9:20-27). The Pearl of Great Price, a Mormon book of scripture,
described the people of Canaan as being cursed with “blackness” (Moses
7:5-8) and indicated that descendents of Ham and his wife Egyptus were
“cursed... as pertaining to the Priesthood” (Abraham 1:21-26).
In 1849, Brigham Young
declared that “the Lord had cursed Cain’s seed with blackness and
prohibited them the Priesthood,” a position he reaffirmed in a January
16, 1852 statement to the Utah territorial legislature:
Any man having one drop of
the seed of [Cain]… in him cannot hold the priesthood and if no other
Prophet ever spake it before I will say it now in the name of Jesus
Christ I know it is true and others know it.
Another rationale for
Mormon discrimination against African Americans was articulated in 1845
by Mormon Apostle Orson Hyde, who speculated that the cursed condition
of African Americans was a consequence of their actions during their
premortal existence.
Throughout the late
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, these doctrines gained
traction while memories of early African-American priesthood holders
like Elijah Abel faded; Church leaders continued to prohibit temple
ordinances and priesthood ordination for Church members with as little
as “1/32” African-American ancestry. In 1949, the First Presidency of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints issued a statement
declaring that the black priesthood ban was a “direct commandment from
the Lord, on which is founded the doctrine of the Church from the days
of its organization.”
The rise of the Civil
Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s actually spurred some Mormon
leaders to renew their support for discrimination. In a 1954 speech at
Brigham Young University, Apostle Mark E. Peterson denounced
interracial marriage on theological grounds, arguing that “if there is
one drop of Negro blood in my children... they receive the curse [of
Canaan]”; in 1958 Bruce R. McConkie wrote in Mormon Doctrine that
African Americans had been “less valiant in the pre-existence,” and
thus “sent to earth through the lineage of Cain.” Speaking from the
pulpit at a semi-annual Church Conference in 1965, Apostle Ezra Taft
Benson (a former Secretary of Agriculture under Eisenhower) charged
that the Civil Rights Movement was a Communist plot to destroy America.
Other Mormon leaders were
more moderately disposed towards African American equality. Historians
credit Apostle Hugh B. Brown and Church President David O. McKay with
efforts to open the question of ending the priesthood ban, even though
both men maintained personal misgivings about the Civil Rights
Movement. In 1969, the First Presidency of the Church issued an
official statement expressing support for full civil equality under the
law for all citizens regardless of race while defending the black
priesthood ban as a prerogative of religious freedom.
On June 8, 1978, the First
Presidency of the Church of Jesus-Christ of Latter-day Saints announced
that “the long-promised day has come when every faithful, worthy man in
the Church may receive the holy priesthood,” effectively ending the
prohibition on full African American participation. The announcement
was accepted as revelation by an affirmation of the Church membership
at the October Church General Conference and subsequently canonized as
scripture.
In the years since the
repeal of the priesthood ban, a number of official steps have been
taken to correct prejudice within the Church. The Church published a
new edition of the Book of Mormon in 1981, replacing a promise that the
righteous would become “white” with a promise that they would be made
“pure” (2 Nephi 30:6), but leaving intact a handful of other Book of
Mormon scriptures correlating dark skin with spiritual accursedness. In
1990, Helvecio Martins, an Afro-Brazilian Mormon, became the first man
of African descent to be ordained as one of the Church’s General
Authorities. African-American Mormons and their allies have also
undertaken a number of unofficial efforts to raise consciousness about
Black Mormon experience and concerns, like the well-received 2007
documentary Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black Mormons. (Experts
estimate there are now about 1 million Mormons of African descent
worldwide.)
But without an official,
explicit clarification of earlier teachings on race, many older Mormons
continue to quietly maintain and circulate old beliefs connecting
blackness and the priesthood ban to the Cain-Ham genealogy or to lack
of spiritual valiance in pre-earthly life. Younger Mormons born after
the end of the priesthood ban, and raised in what one prominent black
Mormon has described as Mormonism’s “deafening silence” on race, have
little knowledge of the Church’s history of discrimination and few
resources for coming to terms with it.
Indeed, Mormons may now
have a greater sense of their own historical persecution as a religious
minority than they do a sense of responsibility for the Mormon Church’s
discriminatory history. Whereas Mormonism’s African-American problem is
rarely discussed within mainstream orthodox Mormon circles, stories
about nineteenth-century anti-Mormon mob violence, the state of
Missouri’s 1838 Mormon “extermination order,” the assassination of
Joseph Smith Jr., and the subsequent exodus to Utah are frequently
recounted. Last November’s protests directed at Mormon temples and
wardhouses after the election only confirmed and intensified Mormons’
deeply-held sense of marginalization and persecution.
Elder Oaks’ October 13
analogy between African Americans and Mormons mobilized this sense of
persecution and galvanized Mormon same-sex marriage opponents, just as
Maine’s Proposition 1 campaign to ban same-sex marriage enters its home
stretch and last-minute fundraising appeals from the National
Organization for Marriage find their way into Mormon same-sex marriage
activists’ inboxes.
It's about time LDS Church had an African general authority
By Robert Kirby
Tribune Columnist
Updated: 04/17/2009
The LDS Church reached a
milestone last week when we ordained our first black African general
authority. Elder Joseph W. Sitati of Nairobi, Kenya, was admitted to
the First Quorum of Seventy.
During General Conference,
Sitati was presented for a sustaining vote of the entire church
membership, including those of us watching from home with a bag of
Doritos. It was such a momentous occasion that I thought a second vote
was required.
"All those who can sustain the idea that this sort of thing was about dang time, please manifest by ..."
Sorry. That was irreverent,
I know. It's just that I feel personally vindicated. Years ago, I
constantly had to defend against intractable church policy a deeply
held personal belief -- specifically that Beth Martin in fourth period
math was hot.
Beth was also
African-American. For a Mormon boy, dating black girls back then was
discouraged because -- should the unconscionable happen and we got
married-- our male children wouldn't be able to hold the priesthood.
Fellow Mormons weren't the
only ones troubled by interracial dating. When word got out about my
interest in Beth, her brother and several of his friends punched me
goofy after school.
That was California.
Growing up Mormon during the black priesthood ban wasn't as big of a
problem in Utah where nearly everyone was Flock of Seagulls white.
It was tougher outside of
Zion, especially in such places where a Mormon guy might find himself
the only Blowfish in a crowd of Hooties.
It happened to me. In the
70s, public opinion regarding the church's policy toward blacks had
reached a crisis. There were fiery editorials, angry demonstrations,
and lots of name-calling. In the middle of it all, I was hauled off to
the Army.
The first day of basic
training was straight out of the movie "Stripes." Our platoon gathered
for a little personal orientation. We took turns introducing ourselves
and where we came from, after which Drill Sgt. Valentine paired us up
as "bunk buddies."
Bunk buddies watched out
for each other. They trained, ate, slept, pulled guard duty and
suffered horribly together. If one bunk buddy screwed up, both paid for
it.
When it was my turn,
Valentine's eyes actually glowed when he heard the word "Utah." Not
only was our drill sergeant extremely African-American, but also a
follower of current events. He immediately demanded to know whether I
was Mormon.
I confessed that I was.
However, before I could add that I wasn't a very good one, Valentine
had already shoved me next to a kid from Mississippi.
My new mandatory best
friend possessed the general size, hue and temperament of a Cape
buffalo. Clearly unhappy with the arrangement, he spent the next
several days referring to me as something that was almost certainly a
mortal sin.
Cunningham hated me and I
was afraid of him. Fortunately, Valentine managed to beat that out of
both of us. Within a week, my bunk buddy and I were on speaking terms.
By the second, we had each other's backs. Toward the end, our
respective colors had run together and become Army green.
There's a lesson here somewhere. If so, maybe we're starting to get it.
SON OF HAM!
SALT LAKE CITY, March 22
/PRNewswire/ -- Finally, after 175 years of speculations, this new
book, the first in a series, unveils the best kept secrets from the
world concerning racism between the Anglos and the people of African
lineage!
Many
scriptural scholars, to average members of the LDS Church, to simple
critics everywhere, have wondered why the Priesthood was withheld from
people of African lineage from 1830 to 1978.
Some consider the Mormon Prophets racists while others assume political motivation. To others the answers go much deeper.
Could this book, "A Son of Ham Under the Covenant", hold the sought answers to this question?
Among
numerous Latter-day Saints worldwide of different ethnic background,
Thurl Bailey, an African American of remarkable accomplishment, N.B.A.
Star, Inspirational Speaker & Entertainer, strongly believes this
book answers his questions. He says "There were ... many questions that
I desired from the Lord an answer to. The Lord's promise to me was that
if I trusted in Him, He would make all things clear to me in time.
Maybe not all today, or maybe not even when I desired, but in time! I
believe Luckner that this book was written as part of that promise.
Thank you for the work you have done for Our Father and his faithful
servants."
Perhaps
for the first time in the Church's entire history, Luckner Huggins
offers a positive response, based on scriptural evidences as to the
real reasons the people of African lineage waited so long for
Priesthood inclusion. Presented as a novel, this first book explores
the roots of voodoo in Haiti, the author's birthplace. During his
exploration he found the connection between voodoo and the exclusion of
his African ancestors in Church's Priesthood.
Luckner's business experiences have taken him to many parts of the
world where he was constantly asked why the Mormon Church Priesthood
was withheld from his ancestors of African lineage for 148 years.
Finally, after about 20 years of combined intellectual and spiritual
experiences, such as interpreting for the Church's Semi-annual General
Conferences and translating the main doctrinal scriptures and
curriculum material he came to terms with this controversial issue.
SOURCE Noah's Family Publishing
Web Site:
http://www.sonofham.com
Biography of early black Mormon honored
UC Santa Cruz Currents
September
11, 2006
UCSC
Summer Session program manager Connell O'Donovan has won a $500 scholarship and
a trip to the John Whitmer Historical Association annual conference for his
biography of Walker Lewis (1798-1856), an important Boston abolitionist and
early black Mormon. The conference will be in October in Independence, Missouri.
O'Donovan's biography, "The Mormon Priesthood Ban and Elder Q. Walker Lewis: 'An
Example for His More Whiter Brethren to Follow,' " is slated to be published in
the annual journal of the John Whitmer Historical Association this month.
O'Donovan's research reveals why Mormon leader Brigham Young banned black men
from becoming Mormon priests beginning in 1847. Young's actions on the issue
have long been of interest among Mormon historians. The race-based ban was
rescinded in 1978.
Prof's apparent link of blacks, welfare draws ire
By JOHN MILLER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
BOISE, Idaho -- An eastern Idaho
history professor who appears to link what he described as his region's low
welfare recipient rate with the fact that "we don't have blacks in this area to
speak of" is drawing irate reaction.
Rick Davis, a professor at
Mormon-owned Brigham Young University-Idaho in Rexburg, told The Associated
Press he was quoted accurately by the Internet publication salon.com in an
article about Idaho conservatives.
But he didn't intend to insult
blacks, he said Tuesday.
"I can see that it might sound that
way," Davis told the AP. "I didn't know I put them (the reference to welfare and
blacks) so close together. That's the curse of being quoted without looking at
your copy."
Members of the National Association
for the Advancement of Colored People in Idaho said they're concerned about
Davis's comments. They unfairly perpetuate stereotypical views of minorities and
further the impression that eastern Idaho is hostile to anybody but the whites
who make up 96 percent of the population, they said.
"His statements are derogatory, discriminatory and racially
based," said Mary Toy, president of the NAACP in Boise. "When you make blanket
statements like that, you've got to make sure, number one, your facts are
correct, and two, that you're not singling out a group of people, whether it's
race-based, religious-based or politically based."
According to the
U.S. Census Bureau, just 0.6 percent of Idaho residents are black. In Madison
County, where Rexburg is located, it's just 0.3 percent.
In the salon.com article, author
Tim Grieve characterizes Rexburg as the nation's most conservative region. He
describes signs outside apartments advertising "Approved housing for young
ladies" and the difficulty of getting a drink in a town where
liquor-by-the-glass has been banned since 1947.
Davis, who has taught in Rexburg
for three decades, told Grieve why he thought so many people in the area are
likely to remain loyal to their conservative roots in the upcoming November
election.
"Rexburg Mormons" - "so red that
you just bleed," Davis said - aren't to be confused with "Boston Mormons," his
description of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints members from outside
the Rocky Mountain West who may be more liberal.
Rexburg's population has "a very
high education level... a very high income level," Davis told salon.com.
"That equates with being
conservatives," he said. "We're fiscally aware of where the money comes from,
and that it doesn't grow on the great tree in Washington. We don't have any
welfare state in this area at all. We don't have blacks in this area to speak
of. We've had them, and they've come and gone. Not to say they were driven out;
they've just felt uncomfortable because there aren't enough of them - like you
and me moving to Montgomery, Ala."
According to the U.S. Census
Bureau, the average median income in Madison County is about $32,000 - some
$7,000 less than the average for the state. And just 24.4 percent of residents
older than 25 have college bachelor's degrees, only slightly higher than the
21.7 percent average for the rest of the state, the Census reported in 2000.
In addition, the Idaho Department
of Health and Welfare is active in eastern Idaho. In Rexburg, for instance, the
number of recipients of a taxpayer-funded program that feeds poor mothers and
their kids has risen about 80 percent since BYU-Idaho five years ago became a
four-year school and began attracting more families, Idaho's District 7 Health
Department said.
BYU-Idaho President Kim Clark, dean
of the Harvard Business School in Boston before coming to Rexburg in 2005,
couldn't be reached for comment.
Marc Stevens, a spokesman for the
13,500-student school, said officials have spoken with Davis.
He faces no official reprimand,
though his comments are a "concern," Stevens said.
"The university has a clear policy
on political neutrality," Stevens said. "Employees are free to share opinions,
that's a basic right. But when their name is connected to the university, that's
where it gets a little difficult."
One black university student in
eastern Idaho said she was shocked by the article.
"My mouth is open," said Katrina Vollbrecht, a student at
Idaho State University in Pocatello and former president of the NAACP chapter
there, adding she was amazed that Davis, "who supposedly is well-educated, said
this."
Blacks in the LDS Church
Faithful witness
New film and revived group help many feel at
home in their church
By Peggy Fletcher Stack
The Salt Lake Tribune
07/06/2007
Darius Gray has been answering
the same question for 40 years: Why would an African American join the LDS
Church, which didn't allow blacks to be priests in its all-male lay clergy until
1978?
The calls keep coming from blacks and whites in every state, in and out of
the church. And, with the ease of Googling, it's virtually guaranteed that any
person of color will be well-aware of Mormonism's former racial policy.
The Rev. Al Sharpton and others already have raised the issue in Mitt
Romney's presidential campaign, with questions about the candidate's
participation in a church that was once restrictive against blacks.
Gray, the gentle author and businessman who led the Genesis Group for
African-American Mormons from 1997 to 2003, has become a kind of helpline. He
and others in the group have counseled privately with hundreds of black members
and responded to media queries. He and Margaret Blair Young co-wrote a trilogy,
tracing the history of blacks in the LDS Church.
While the issue may never be conclusively put to rest, Gray and Young hope
the documentary film they've been working on for four years will add important
context and move the conversation forward.
"Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black Mormons," due to be completed in
August, explores the African-American presence in the LDS Church from its
earliest days and confronts the hard issues that surfaced in the most turbulent
years of the civil-rights movement of the 1960s.
It discusses the 1978 revelation ending the ban and describes the lives and
challenges of modern black Mormon pioneers. It includes never-released footage
of interviews shot in 1968 and many rare archival photographs as well as
interviews with members, social scientists, clergy and historians.
"This is not a sanitized nor a bitter piece. We are neither proselytizing
nor bashing," Gray said this week. "We present it in a balanced fashion. Some
blacks and whites remain in the church; others have left over this issue."
The film is a chance for contemporary black Mormons to "share their joys,
excitement, sadness and struggles," he says. "We live with the perception of a
racist institution. Our stories dispel that notion and add to the fabric of
Mormon culture."
Understanding the past
Jerri Harwell joined the LDS Church in Detroit in 1977 and was denied in her
attempt to serve a mission until after 1978. For 30 years, she has reached out
to other black members, helping sustain their faith and understand their
importance to the church.
In the past few years, Harwell has delighted audiences at parades, schools
and This Is the Place Heritage Park on Salt Lake City's east bench with her
portrayal of Jane Manning James, an early black Mormon convert.
Unlike several black men who accompanied Brigham Young to the valley, James
was not a slave. She was a strong, determined, independent woman, convinced that
God directed her toward The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
In the early days of the church, there was no official policy forbidding
blacks from holding the priesthood. Mormon founder Joseph Smith publicly opposed
slavery and ordained at least one black man, Elijah Abel.
But after Young took over the fledgling faith, he attached to it prejudices,
common in America at the time, that blacks were inherently inferior. No longer
were men with even a drop of African blood allowed to be ordained to the
priesthood, which otherwise was available to virtually all males starting at age
12. (Women of any race are not ordained in the LDS priesthood.) Black men and
women could be members, but not hold any significant positions. They couldn't be
leaders, serve missions or be married in one of the faith's temples.
The policy mirrored American views until the mid-20th century, with the
rising of America's civil-rights movement. In the 1960s and '70s, LDS
Church-owned Brigham Young University in Provo faced protests from other
schools, and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir was the target of boycotts around the
nation.
In response, Mormon leaders and writers sought justification in long-held
teachings, some used by Christians to defend slavery.
Some taught that Africans were "cursed with black skin" as descendants of
the biblical Noah's son Ham. The Bible says that because Ham saw his father's
naked body, he and his descendants were cursed to be the "servant of servants."
To this, Mormons added a unique twist: that blacks were somehow "less
valiant" than other races in the spirit world before this life.
In 1968, Gray was a young reporter at Mormon-owned KSL. An independent
filmmaker interviewed him and three other black Mormons on "the question." The
current documentary reinterviews three of the four, all of whom remain faithful.
"This is where God wanted me to be," Gray says. "Then and now."
A joyous ending
On June 9, 1978, LDS President Spencer W. Kimball announced that the church
was opening its priesthood ranks to "all worthy men," including those of African
descent.
The change brought a string of firsts: First black priest ordained in Utah.
First black missionary. First black bishop. First black couple married in the
temple. First black men ordained in Los Angeles, Rio de Janeiro, Jamaica,
Nigeria. First black general authority. Africans began joining the LDS Church in
droves.
It brought relief to many white Mormons who were mortified by charges of
racism leveled at them and their church. For black Mormons, however, the past is
still very present. Eliminating racism is as tough as stamping out mercury. It
keeps morphing into different shapes.
Danor Gerald, an actor and film student at Utah Valley State College who is
helping to edit the documentary, joined the LDS Church in 1994. Growing up in
Texas, Gerald knew overt racism, but he knew nothing about the church's past
statements until he moved to Utah.
"I was surprised by the racist folklore that I had never heard before," he
says.
Today, many black Mormons report subtle differences in the way they are
treated, as if they are not full members but a separate group. A few even have
been called "the n-word" at church and in the hallowed halls of the temple. They
look in vain at photos of Mormon general authorities, hoping to see their own
faces reflected there.
They are faithful Latter-day Saints who support the church and "Genesis
gives them a sense of belonging," says Don Harwell, Genesis president since
2003.
The community of black Mormons was created in 1971 as a kind of support
group, with the late Ruffin Bridgeforth as president and Gray as one of his two
counselors. The group met monthly to share spiritual testimonies, sermons and
socializing. After 1978, the need to gather slowly diminished and it became
dormant for a decade. But in October 1996, many black members wanted to
reconnect, so Genesis re-emerged stronger than ever.
Today the meetings attract some 350 people, many of whom are white families
who have adopted black children. They want their children to see African
Americans as leaders and role models.
"Many mistake the gospel culture for white culture," says Harwell, a
counselor in his LDS stake young men's presidency. "We are examples that the
gospel is more inclusive."
Similar groups are springing up in Hattiesburg, Miss., Cincinnati and
Columbus, Ohio, Los Angeles, Oakland and Houston.
"Genesis exists to help missionaries with potential converts and new members
to feel at home in the church," Harwell says. "We are always trying to help."
Prophetic messages
Unfortunately, the blacks-as-cursed belief continues to be circulated at the
grass-roots level and supported in quasi-official publications such as Mormon
Doctrine and the Mortal Messiah series by Bruce R. McConkie, an
influential LDS apostle who died in 1985. All attempts to get the church to
repudiate these notions have been rebuffed.
The official position: Only God knows the reason it took so long to
eliminate the ban.
When a German television reporter asked LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley in
2002 why it took so long to overcome the church's institutional racism, he
replied: "I don't know. I don't know. [Long pause.] I can only say that."
But a significant number of black and white Latter-day Saints feel it would
"be helpful and morally right for the church to disavow some of the past
statements," Gray says. "That would clear the way so the gospel can grow
unimpeded."
He and others were pleased when Hinckley strongly condemned racist language
in all forms during the church's General Conference in April 2006.
"I remind you that no man who makes disparaging remarks concerning those of
another race can consider himself a true disciple of Christ. Nor can he consider
himself to be in harmony with the teachings of the Church of Christ," Hinckley
told the men assembled during the priesthood session of the two-day conference.
"How can any man holding the Melchizedek Priesthood arrogantly assume that
he is eligible for the priesthood whereas another who lives a righteous life but
whose skin is of a different color is ineligible?"
Black Mormons everywhere hailed their prophet's powerful words.
"This was the most helpful statement in 175 years. Not to be greedy, but
more is needed," Gray says. "I hope the uplifting, true stories of contemporary
black Mormons will stand as an example of faith and perseverance for all -
regardless of race."
Documentary Chronicles History of Blacks in Mormon Church
Myfoxutah.com
March 9, 2008
MURRAY, Utah -- Elijah
Abel, Jane Manning James and Green Flake hold a unique, but rather obscure place
in Mormon history: all three were members of their church in the mid-1800s and
all three were black.
Abel was the first black man ordained to the priesthood in The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. James worked in the home of church founder
Joseph Smith and followed the faith's next president, Brigham Young, across the
plains to Utah in 1848. Flake came to Utah as well, but as the slave of white
members. He was freed by Young in 1854.
Such stories won't remain unknown if Darius Gray and Margaret Young have
anything to do with it -- they've chronicled the struggles of black Latter-day
Saints in a new documentary "Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black Mormons."
"To me it's parallel with the story of African Americans period," said Gray,
a black member of the church since 1964. "We talk about the black history and
contributions being either lost, stolen or strayed generally and it's the same
within the LDS church."
Nearly six years in the making, the film is an extension of a longtime
partnership between Gray, a former broadcaster, and Young, a writing teacher at
the church-owned Brigham Young University. Together the pair have written three
books on black Mormons.
Wrapped in soulful black spirituals, the 72-minute film takes viewers on a
journey from the days of Mormon pioneers to the 1960s Civil Rights era, when
some university athletics teams refused to compete against BYU because of the
way blacks were treated by the church. It ends with current black church members
sharing their own stories -- good and bad.
"We're not hiding anything, we're not sugar-coating anything," said
Young. "We're telling a very difficult history, but the people who are
telling it have come through it."
Tamu Smith, of Provo, is one of those storytellers.
"It liberating," Smith said of sharing her struggle to fit in and find other
people of color in her faith. "We don't talk about black Mormon history and it's
sad. Every person in the church needs to see this."
Church history shows that founder Smith granted blacks full membership in the
faith not long after founding the church in 1830. Brigham Young reversed the
policy after the Saints came to Utah and blacks remained marginalized until June
8, 1978, when a revelation by then-president Spencer W. Kimball, restored
the priesthood for black men.
It was a stunning change that Gray said he thought would "have to wait until
the second coming for it to occur."
A player in the film in addition to his behind-camera role, Gray said black
Mormons needed to tell their own story instead of letting others continue to
interpret their history.
"It's important to be validated and it's important to share it with our white
brothers and sisters so that can have an appreciation for who we are and from
whence we've come," he said. "Part of it is sweet, part of it is bitter, but
it's our story."
Young said a goal of the film, which was not produced in conjunction with the
church, is to build a bridge between blacks and whites both in and out of the
church.
Gray and Young have been shopping their project to film festivals across the
U.S. To date it's been shown in Dallas, Detroit and San Diego, where so many
turned out that festival organizers had to move the showing to a larger theater.
They hope to find a distributor that will allow the film, which was funded
largely through a University of Utah grant, to be widely seen.
On Saturday, the film drew a crowd of more than 100 at the Foursite Film
Festival, in Ogden, Utah.
"This was very impressive," schoolteacher Tamara Lei Peters said. "There have
been so many questions about black people in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It made
me weep in a few places."
Peters said she knew nothing about black Mormon history before seeing the
film.
David Rowe, who teaches at the Salt Lake Theological Seminary, knew the
history, but said he was surprised by the film.
"I would say it was bracingly forthright about the black Mormons' struggle,"
said the self-described evangelical. "I didn't expect them to allow quite as
much criticism along with the commendation. I expected a bit more of PR gloss,
but I didn't find it overly romanticized."
Mormon Jeanette Lambert of Salt Lake City said perhaps the film can begin to
heal the divisiveness wrought by the past treatment of black church members.
Sadly, some old doctrines that support the idea that blacks are less than full
church members are still taught, said Lambert, a hospice nurse.
"I think there needs to be a concerted effort made to acknowledge that some
things were wrong. It's a part of the repentance process," said the mother of
two teenagers.
Early Latter-day Saints like Abel, James and Flake, "should be some of our
heroes," she said.
Mormons to mark 30 years of
blacks in priesthood
By JENNIFER DOBNER
The Salt Lake Tribune
June 7, 2008
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Thirty
years have passed, but Heber G. Wolsey still cries when he recalls the day the
Mormon church abandoned a policy that had kept black men out of the priesthood.
"It was one of the greatest
days of my life," said Wolsey, who was head of public affairs at The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
On June 8, 1978, Wolsey was
called to a secret rendezvous with N. Eldon Tanner, a member of the church's
First Presidency, in a tunnel beneath the Salt Lake City temple.
He was handed a slip of
paper: "The long-promised day has come when every faithful, worthy man in the
church may receive the holy priesthood ... without regard for race or color."
"I started to bawl," Wolsey
recalled, his eyes again welling with tears. "It's something we'd all been
praying for a long, long time."
Latter-day Saints will mark
the 30th anniversary Sunday with an evening celebration of words and music in
the Salt Lake City Tabernacle.
Heralded as a revelation from
God to church President Spencer W. Kimball, the four-paragraph statement gave
blacks full membership in the church for the first time after nearly 130 years.
Some say it was the most
significant change in church policy since Mormons abandoned polygamy in 1890 to
gain statehood for Utah.
Unlike other religions, the
Mormon priesthood is not a set of trained clerics. It is a lay status granted to
virtually every Mormon male at age 12, allowing them to bestow blessings and
hold certain church callings.
Until 1978, black men could
attend priesthood meetings but could not pass sacraments or give blessings, even
on their own families. They could not enter Mormon temples for sacred
ceremonies, including marriage.
"It left you on the outside,"
said Darius A. Gray, who is black and joined the church as a young man in 1964.
Gray said he learned about
the restriction the day before his baptism. He was raised to value his race, and
the policy went against that. But prayer and study had left him with a belief in
the church that he couldn't ignore.
"So you go forward and walk
through the darkness in faith," he said. "I never knew if the restriction was of
God, or if it was of man, if it was just or unjust."
Early teachings and sermons
by church founder Joseph Smith don't reflect a racist stance. Blacks were not
denied membership, baptism or the priesthood under his leadership. Smith
ordained the former slave Elijah Able to the priesthood in 1836 and sent him on
a proselytizing mission.
But after Smith's death,
Brigham Young reversed the policy, declaring in 1852 that blacks were the
unworthy descendants of Cain and could not hold the priesthood, Mormon historian
Newell Bringhurst said.
"Brigham Young cites divine
sanctification and that's pretty hard to refute," said Bringhurst, who is white
and the co-editor of the book "Black and Mormon."
Although Young's policy was
never considered doctrine, his teachings left the church so entrenched that it
was unable to change, even during the civil rights era of the 1960s and despite
pressure from inside and outside the faith, Bringhurst said.
"It's a tragedy in a way,"
said Bringhurst, who left the Mormon church partly because of its stance on
blacks. "There was this missed opportunity in the 1960s where they could have
easily changed."
Labeled as racist, the church
suffered years of repeated drumming in the news media and from people angered by
the divisive policy, Wolsey said.
"Every day I was working with
people who were highly antagonistic to the church," said Wolsey, who recalled
some schools in the '60s wouldn't compete against Brigham Young University
sports teams.
Prior to 1978, Wolsey and
Gray spent nearly five years touring the country to answer questions about the
church's position during meetings that often would spark angry, contentious
words.
"I said, 'I am not a racist.
I don't have any racial feelings against the blacks at all. I have a part of my
belief that says the blacks can't hold the priesthood,'" Wolsey said. "Women
can't hold the priesthood either; children can't. But I said I believe in the
church, so I accept it."
Church statisticians don't
track membership by race, but scholars believe there were less than 3,000 black
Mormons in 1978.
Since then, the church has
expanded its missionary work in predominantly black nations, including the
Caribbean, South America and Africa, where it now claims more than 250,000
members out of 13.1 million worldwide.
There are no blacks in the
senior leadership tiers of the Salt Lake City-based church. A black Brazilian,
Helvecio Martins, was a member of the Second Quorum of Seventy from 1990-95. He
died in 2005.
In Africa, more than 2,000
men serve in local and regional leadership posts, spokeswoman Kim Farah said.
Gray and Wolsey said the
change in 1978 was good for all members of the church, not just for blacks.
"It removed an impediment
that stood between the brotherhood and sisterhood that needed to be removed,"
Gray said. "It has allowed blacks and whites — not just blacks — to be more open
about these issues, to embrace one another and to be the Christians that God
intended us to be."
30th-anniversary commemoration sparks protests
The Salt Lake Tribune
06/09/2008
The commemoration of the 30th
anniversary of the LDS Church opening priesthood to black men attracted
the criticism of protesters.
"They love to point to, 'Well, now
we have blacks in the priesthood,' " said Timothy Oliver, of Santaquin,
who stood near Temple Square in Salt Lake City on Sunday with a sign
that stated "No blacks allowed before 1978. Why?" Oliver was one of
about 10 demonstrators who positioned themselves in the area as church
members gathered in the Salt Lake Tabernacle to celebrate the
anniversary.
"What they're doing actually is
using the presence of blacks to grease their skids for proselytizing,"
Oliver said. "They made a politically expedient change of policy, but
they haven't changed the doctrine."
Bill McKeever stood outside the
northwest corner of Temple Square with a sign advertising the Web site
www.seedofcain.com, referring to the scriptural text that was
previously used to justify the priesthood ban because dark skin was
thought to be a curse on the offspring of Cain, the biblical son of
Adam.
"If the Mormon leadership expects
their people to repent when they sin, the Mormon Church as a
corporation should repent when [it sins]," McKeever said. "If there
needs to be an apology, there should be one."
Mormons and blacks: Facing up to the moral failures of our past
Melodee Lambert
06/22/2008
I am grateful to Peggy Fletcher
Stack and others at The Salt Lake Tribune who contributed to the
truthful report about the history of blacks in the LDS Church ("Mormon
and Black," Faith, June 8).
I commend them and the newspaper for
providing us with a fair-minded and forthright account of the long
journey from church founder Joseph Smith's baptism and priesthood
ordination of Elijah Abel, a free black man, through the racism of
Brigham Young and its deep, self-inflicted wound to the LDS Church, to
Spencer W. Kimball's inspired 1978 decision to reverse the church
policy of denying the priesthood to black men (and thus also denying
temple ordinances and ceremonies to all black human beings).
Some Mormons are heroes in the
history of change from racism to respect for all; the Tribune story
notes several, including Darius Gray and Margaret Blair Young, creators
of the forthcoming documentary "Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black
Mormons."
There are others, including Hugh B.
Brown and Eugene England, who understood that there was no scriptural
or moral basis for the ban and who worked quietly but with powerful
conviction to change the policy.
Some were uncomfortable with a
policy that clearly had no moral grounding - but multiple moral
contradictions - and with the practice of making God responsible for
it. But most Mormons, including me and most in my large extended Mormon
family, did nothing. Telling evidence of this comfortable racism is
that most did not participate in the civil rights movement.
Mormons tell the story of the
grievous denial of civil rights to their white ancestors in the early
days of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: They were
driven from their homes, some were murdered at Haun's Mill, their
prophet was slain, and they were forced to leave the United States to
practice their religion freely. Most see these as moral issues, just as
most saw defeating the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s as a moral
issue and put the full force of the church into social action as a
result.
But most Mormons did not see civil
rights for black people as a moral issue and most seem blind to the
disconnect of lamenting as immoral the loss of the early Mormons' civil
rights and failing to see the denial of civil rights to blacks as the
same moral issue.
Most Mormons failed to act -
collectively and individually - to end slavery and discrimination
(Brigham Young and a few other Utahns owned slaves) and to ensure civil
rights for all human beings. Most assumed that since the LDS Church did
not allow black men of African descent to hold its priesthood, they
were not required to act as moral agents in behalf of those who were
denied the civil rights that they assumed as their birthright.
I am inspired by the relatively few
Mormons who actively participated in the civil rights movement or who
advocated within the church for an end to racism. A few of my relatives
spoke for civil rights and against the priesthood ban. They helped
awaken me to my responsibility as a human being and as a Christian and
guided me toward activism, as did my parents on other civic issues that
are also moral issues.
I think I understand many of the
sociological forces that created the racism within the LDS Church. I
admire the black Mormons who endured because of their personal faith.
But I worry about young Mormons who have no knowledge of this history,
or of the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and of the moral implications
these realities hold about the responsibilities of moral agency.
Neither of these histories was
taught in LDS seminary or anywhere else in church when I was a young
Mormon growing up in the 1950s and '60s. However, my parents taught me
about the Mountain Meadows Massacre and supported me as I struggled
with the moral contradictions of racism within my faith. (They and most
of my family also support me now as I attend Quaker meetings.)
When asked during a radio interview
why he wrote Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling, historian and Mormon
Richard K. Bushman responded that he did so in part to tell the truth
about Smith and to protect young Mormons with that truth. Juanita
Brooks was similarly motivated when she wrote The Mountain Meadows
Massacre, and Darius Gray and Margaret Blair Young seem to be similarly
motivated in creating "Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black Mormons."
Regardless of religion, or lack of
it, we should all, particularly the most influential teachers - parents
and leaders - follow their lead and that of others who have acted to
end cultural, political and religious bigotry. We should speak truth
and we should act on the responsibilities of individual moral agency to
protect and help all human beings.
* MELODEE LAMBERT is an associate
professor of business communication at Salt Lake Community College,
where she has taught for 23 years.