Burlington Daily Times – July 17, 1930
Open Forum
CONFLICTING TESTIMONY
To the Editor of the Times.
The polite epithets applied, by Mr.
Merrill to the evangelical ministries and churches are amusing. We are
"puerile," not "enlightened," not "reliable," not even "intelligent," but are in
fact guilty of "slanders," and are "fools" who "mock, but shall mourn."
Doubtless his pious soul is weeping for us all in secret places. But his last
quoted earning shows that the Mormon gospel comes to all non-Mormons with a
stern command, "Believe this or be damned." It is the Mormon version of the old
evangelism, with its refrain "Turn or burn." That, however, was taken altogether
from the Word, and Mormonism teaches much that is additional to the "faith once
for all delivered to the saints."
Mr. Merrill grows almost eloquent over the Book of Mormon, and his heat is equal
to the July weather. But he does not deny his faith that the Mormon church shall
eventually possess the earth and rull all mankind. Just now it rules Utah, and
holds the balance of political power in several other states. The zeal and
earnestness and self sacrifice of Mormon missionaries are not gainsaid. Their
spirit is worthy of a better cause. Yet there is another side to the question.
Paul on his missionary tours worked at a trade to eke out his living, and was in
part sustained by his brethren left behind him. Mormon missionaries rely upon
the hospitality of the people whom they would prejudice against their own
churches. They who'd persuade all that unless they accept the new gospel,
notwithstanding Paul's warning, "Though we or an angel from heaven preach any
other gospel unto you, let him be accursed," they will be damned without
remedy....
Our Mormon apologist goes into the field of archaeology. But his facts do not
prove the inspiration of the Book of Mormon. That Cortez and Pizarro found an
old civilization of a high order in Mexico and South America some hundreds of
years before the days of Spaulding and Joe Smith, is known to all well-informed
people. No Mormon revelation was needed to assure them of that fact....
As to the Spaulding manuscript our apologist uses the old device of the lawyer
who had a bad case. In the absence of evidence, he repeats his former
assertions. No amount of evidence that a Spaulding manuscript is in existence,
and is found not to be identical with the Book of Mormon in its contents can
disprove the positive testimony of sundry witnesses who, having become familar
with Spaulding's last work, "The Lost Manuscript Found, or the Lost Tribes of
Israel," found that the Book of Mormon contained not only the same names
invented by Spaulding, but much of the same historical matter. Absolute identity
was never asserted by the Spaulding party, but resemblance in style, and
substance strong enough to suggest imitation or plagiarism. Henry Lake,
Spaulding's former partner, for instance, procured a copy of the Book of Mormon,
and was astounded at the similarity between the book and the work of his old
fiends. Nor can this fact be gainsaid that Mormons sent Hurlbut to procure the
original "Lost Manuscript Found" from Spaulding's widow. For that wehave his own
admission. Such facts are enough to give any man ground for caution in listening
to the persuasive eloquence of Mormon proselyters.
As to Sidney Rigdon, well known to have been a visionary and an erratic genius
unreliable in his statements, the evidence of his brother, Dr. L. Rigdon, of
Hamilton, O. in a letter to the Baptist Witness of March 1, 1875, is sufficient
to break the force of his testimony, living or dying. Referring to an accident
which Sidney suffered, and which caused confusion of the brain, Dr. Rigdon says,
that the injury to his brother's brain "ever afterwards seriously affected his
character and in some respects his conduct." Of the wicked we are told, "there
are no bands in their death," and that the ruling passion of fanatics and of
insane people should be strong in death, is not to be wondered at.
The Mormon accounts of the fate of the alleged golden plates is illuminating and
to any thoughtful soul, quite conclusive. The angel Moroni who has been in
hiding ever since, took back the plates and hid them away until the time shall
come when they are again to be resurrected. To be sure. He was a wise angel --
just such an one as Joe Smith could create in his own imagination. It was wise
in Moroni to hide those plates, rather than allow them to be inspected by our
great Egyptologists, who would be able to decipher any ancient writings. And as
to the witnesses, men testify that they have merely "hefted" a bundle of plates
and turned the leaves are not qualified to testify to their genuineness or to
the meaning of the inscriptions thereon. I suspect that any audable voice which
assured the other three of the correctness of the "Prophet's" translation was
not a divine voice. As to one of those witnesses, we know that a voice -- that
of Prof. Charles Anthon, of Columbia college -- told him the writing was a
humbug and had not meaning at all.... That Harris was after all persuaded to
trust Smith but shows the "deceivableness of unrighteousness." "Be no more
children, tossed to and fro with every wind of doctrine, etc., Eph. 4:15.
Wm. P. M'Corkle.